Bernard M. Patten: Truth Knowledge Or Just Plain Bull How To Tell The DifferenceA Handbook of Practical Logic and Clear Thinking

N the back You be better off searching out those sources for whatever wisdom may be Riding Class (Saddle Club, deeply buried here I like first half of this book The later half is tedious The book introduced some common mistakes of logical and clear thinking and was written in humorous way I think it is good for readers who think logic is boringI think it is NOT a good introductory book for logic and clear thinking but if you have some understanding in critical thinking this book can help you reinforcing your knowledge and skillMay be interference from small spot is the practice of neurologist it seems the author emphasized the correctness of every single sentence in the argument Maybe it isue to the assumption that argument from a guy with logical flaw is Silver Stirrups (Saddle Club, dubious It makes me a layman feel wield in some of the examples and analysisBut anyway I enjoyed reading this book and learn a lo. Owledge uickly and painlesslyEmphasizing practical usefulness in real life situations and evidence based analysis Dr Patten examinesinvestment frauds and other scamsgroupthinkthe psychology of beliefcontent analysishidden meaningsnegotiation strategiesHe also gives careful attention to the rules of clear thinkingiscusses the reality principle explains inductive and Different Class deductive logic exposes traditional fallacies and elucidates truth tables syllogisms and symbolic logicFast fact filled and fun this superb self help guide to better thinking teaches you to take control of your ownestiny by accurately etermining the truth value of statements and behaviors in many contex.

Free read Truth Knowledge Or Just Plain Bull How To Tell The DifferenceA Handbook of Practical Logic and Clear Thinking

EPUB Truth Knowledge Or Just Plain Bull How To Tell The DifferenceA Handbook of Practical Logic and Clear Thinking Ô Bernard M. Patten –

Better logic books out there Author makes logical fallacy errors and presumptions that he rants against Bad bad bad Check for other s critiues This book was a joy to read It s a book on critical thinking It s not a book on formal logic or critical thinking isn t meant to be nor is it meant to be some sort of text book It s a general critical thinking book that s accessible to everyone There are way better books on the subject He tries to put English arguments in basic in logical form without considering any of the implicit points and claims that the eficits he finds are reasons to reject those arguments when you encounter them in everyday life English is fuzzy and not everything is stated so you just can t Goldilocks the Three Bears do that WHile it s not the best book on the subject itoes provide related basic information However the tone seems superior and becomes bothersome at Want to sort out the claims of experts pseudo experts scam artists and liars alike Want to protect yourself from the angers of the ubiuitous nonsense and outright frauds that assault you from every side Want to become acuainted with the pleasurable activity of iscovering truth while enhancing your sophistication as a thinkerIn this erudite yet entertaining handbook on critical thinking Dr Bernard M Patten uses neuroscience psychology and psychiatry to teach you to Socialist Realism do all this and He shows you that clear thinking is not just fun but also keeps you out of trouble makes you efficient helps youevelop and maintain prosperity and generally gives you an edge in both your.

He point in which the author insists that the reader has to repeat every chapter than twice if possible and I Look Up To... Michelle Obama do some exercises at the end of it It feels a little manipulative and at some points the perspective is subjective even though it isescribed as objective I rated it a 35 because I learned some things from it and I found some of the fallacies uite funny I picked up this book with high hopes it seemed to use an entertaining sharp witted prose to explain the basic tenants of pragmatic thinking Unfortunately by mid book that convention was tired and well established as self contradictory I uit at page 149331The book is basically an anecdote of how much smarter he is than everybody Yet he can t write a book that gets out of the introduction without a contradiction There are no simple answers In just 9 chapters I ll explain why There is a great bibliography Personal and business lifeA Board Certified neurologist and a lecturer in formal informal and symbolic logic at Rice University Dr Patten has the scientific background as well as the philosophical training to give readers the most reliable and current information on how the brain thinks learns and remembers By means of multiple and sometimes startling contemporary examples and insights the author exercises your mind as an exercise machine might exercise your muscles Each exercise is specifically formulated with the neuropsychology of learning in mind repetition tied association visual images istribution of tasks in time modularity etc so the reader acuires valuable kn.